GDPR-native by design.
Residency by choice.
For security operators who cannot put their evidence on someone else's continent. Configurable EU/UK, private-cloud or on-premise residency, a Data Processing Addendum and a tamper-evident chain — sovereignty as a default, not an add-on.
Most guard-management platforms are US-hosted SaaS. For an operator under European obligations — or a government, defence or critical-infrastructure client demanding sovereignty — that is a structural problem, not a checkbox. Where the evidence lives decides who can compel it.
FieldOps treats data residency as a deployment decision you make, not one made for you. It runs in the EU/UK, in a private cloud, or entirely on-premise — including air-gapped — with the same operational record either way. Access is role-scoped, processing is governed by a DPA, and the evidence chain is tamper-evident.
Read the full posture in security & compliance, or compare against US-hosted tools in the TrackTik alternative view.
Run in an EU or UK region so the operational record stays inside European jurisdiction by default, not by exception.
Deploy into a private tenancy you control, isolating the data from shared infrastructure where contract or regulation demands it.
For sovereign, regulated or air-gapped requirements, FieldOps runs entirely on infrastructure you control — with no dependency on a vendor-owned cloud.
A Data Processing Addendum, role-scoped access, data-subject rights handling and a tamper-evident evidence chain — the same operational record across every model.
Residency is not something most operators think about — until a client, a regulator or a jurisdiction makes it the deciding factor. These are the cases where it is the point, not a checkbox.
Firms under GDPR that cannot defensibly place their evidence on another continent.
Public-sector, defence and critical-infrastructure clients who require sovereignty as a contractual condition.
Operations where an auditor or insurer expects to know exactly where the record lives and who can compel it.
Regions with in-country residency obligations, where a US-hosted SaaS is a non-starter from the first meeting.
Read the full posture in security & compliance, or how the evidence chain stays intact wherever it runs.
Residency is rarely the reason a platform is chosen — but it is often the reason one is rejected, late, after the operational fit has already been proven. Choosing a US-hosted system first and discovering the sovereignty problem second is the expensive order to do it in.
- A government or defence tender is lost on a data-location clause, not on capability.
- A regulator asks where the evidence lives, and the honest answer is "another continent".
- A client demands in-country residency the incumbent platform cannot offer.
- A migration is forced mid-contract because the original choice could not be made compliant.
- Foreign-jurisdiction access to the record becomes a risk no clause fully removes.
FieldOps avoids the order problem by making residency a decision you take at deployment — so sovereignty is settled before the operation depends on it, not retrofitted after.
“Compared to colleagues still using spreadsheets and clipboards — we're ahead. Way ahead.”— Michal Gábor · Team Leader · Sentinel Security · Praha · read the case study →
What European buyers
ask about hosting.
Where is FieldOps data hosted?
Is FieldOps GDPR compliant?
Can FieldOps run on-premise or air-gapped?
Is FieldOps a GDPR-native alternative to US-cloud guard-management software?
Do you sign a Data Processing Addendum?
Can we host FieldOps ourselves with no vendor cloud dependency?
How are data-subject requests handled?
Sovereignty is a deployment decision.
Make it yours.
Twenty minutes is enough to establish your residency and compliance constraints — before anyone proposes a platform.